Suzanne Moore wrote ten years about that women’s rage is “totally thrilling”. And she was right.
I saw the Women In Revolt exhibition at Tate Britain last week and I was totally thrilled.
Elvis never lived to be 43. I did.
Suzanne Moore wrote ten years about that women’s rage is “totally thrilling”. And she was right.
I saw the Women In Revolt exhibition at Tate Britain last week and I was totally thrilled.
Gatekeepers. All women know about them, whatever their job or chosen leisure activity. And the music business has always been one of the top villains.
Within that crowded field, Jann Wenner, co-founder of Rolling Stone magazine, recently emerged as an arch villain. In case you missed it, he put out a book of archive interviews which was full of old white blokes. When challenged about the lack of women said: “none of them were as articulate enough on this intellectual level”. And made a similar point about Black musicians. Prat.
The ensuing controversy even lost him his gig with the ever-irrelevant Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, which isn’t exactly squeaky clean when it comes to ignoring minorities.
So why am I writing about this now?
I suspect that some books get listed (particularly in the case of memoir) because they tell a good story rather than for the quality of the writing. Sound Within Sound, though, qualifies as literature; Kate Molleson used to be a music critic, and her descriptions of how things sound are precise and poetic. But she tells a good story too – in fact, many good stories.
Another
day, another Elon Musk rumour. This time it’s about plans to charge people to
use Twitter (which no-one will ever call X).
From a business
point of view, this is nuts. He should know that most of his user base are
hanging on by a thread, under sufferance, and we’ll all be gone if that happens. It’ll probably
turn out to be another attention-seeking item like the notion of removing the
block function (which turned out to be illegal).
It’s weird,
because for years I’ve been saying I’d be happy to pay if it meant no ads. Why?
Because I valued Twitter.
Looking at it now, you might be wondering why.
Since its original release, the book has become Rough Trade Book of the Year, a Rolling Stone Book of the Year and a Mojo Book of the Year. But, I wondered, is it really a music book? There is after all a lot about Miki’s life before Lush: so is it a book about a person - like a “normal” memoir - rather than a book about music?
Of course, you can’t really separate those things, as everyone whose life has been immersed in music knows. So the first half of the book is about Miki’s dysfunctional, damaging childhood and adolescence. The second half is about her dysfunctional life in the music business. And they make sense of each other.